I have been a fan of M. Night Shyamalan ever since I first experienced
The Sixth Sense. I have looked forward to, and I have enjoyed each one of his subsequent films; although, none of them have been as striking to me as his first production. My second favorite Shyamalan film has to be
Unbreakable, and without question my least favorite is
Signs (sorry Mel). That leaves
The Village standing somewhere in the middle of my approval meter, however his latest production has a certain quality - at least in my eyes - that sets it apart from all the rest.
On both occasions when I watched
The Village, once in theater and once this afternoon, I was struck with the impression that the film could be viewed as an extended allegory. None of the special features on the DVD indicate that this was Shyamalan's intension, so I must confess this interpretation is much more representative of what I bring to the film as opposed to its original design. However, I believe viewing this film in an allegorical sense provides a whole new way of enjoying and perceiving its content.
The village is a kind of nineteenth century utopian society that has been set up as an oasis of purity and innocence in response to the pervasive evil found in the contemporary world. The village remains isolated and insulated from the world because it is surrounded by a forest filled with malevolent beasts that threaten to destroy any who venture beyond its set boundaries. A complex network of rituals and rules is present within the utopian community, they are guidelines for the people in the relationship they share with "those they do not mention".
The allegory I perceive within this film hinges within the twist of its plot. This isolated Victorian community abides not in the 1900s, but rather in the 21st century. Its isolation is nothing more than a creation of a group of elders who have become disenchanted with the corruption of the world. The elders themselves dress up as the beasts that instill fear within the hearts of the villagers, compelling them not to go beyond the borders of their safe community. Ultimately, the innocence of this utopian society is the product of an intentional fabrication of the elders, a fabrication that cannot be perpetuated without the ongoing ignorance of its members.
When I watched
The Village I was struck with the feeling that Shyamalan was making a critique of organized religion, which is represented by "the village". The borders of the village are the rules of religious orthodoxy, which are protected by the manufactured threats of the religious leaders (ie hell). Ironically, the medicine that is required to "save" an injured member of the village can only be found beyond its borders. The physical blindness of the central character, Ivy Walker, represents the ongoing state of the village as she brings medicine back from the outside world. The life of her love is saved, but in the end the blindness of the village toward a greater reality only serves to be strengthened.
Admittedly, I may be reading way too much into this. But, I would like to pose this question: to what extent is innocence possible without ignorance?